http://hm2k.com/posts/friendly-urls The research of an internet entrepreneur and IT consultant Tue, 25 May 2010 11:01:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://hm2k.com/posts/friendly-urls/comment-page-1#comment-119194 hm2k Wed, 12 Nov 2008 12:55:48 +0000 http://hm2k.com/posts/friendly-urls#comment-119194 I don't like MultiViews, second guessing isn't really something I like my web server to do, further more rewrites are so much more powerful. I don’t like MultiViews, second guessing isn’t really something I like my web server to do, further more rewrites are so much more powerful.

]]> http://hm2k.com/posts/friendly-urls/comment-page-1#comment-88544 Zeeshan Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:30:40 +0000 http://hm2k.com/posts/friendly-urls#comment-88544 I would have to agree. Using a resource extensive module to act as glue between your application and the HTTPd is wasteful. Consider using the PATH_INFO environment via MultiViews, as Ben Steele highlighted. It's also possible to use it via SetAction and ForceType. I would have to agree. Using a resource extensive module to act as glue between your application and the HTTPd is wasteful. Consider using the PATH_INFO environment via MultiViews, as Ben Steele highlighted. It’s also possible to use it via SetAction and ForceType.

]]> http://hm2k.com/posts/friendly-urls/comment-page-1#comment-6 Ben Steele Sun, 28 Jan 2007 10:52:03 +0000 http://hm2k.com/posts/friendly-urls#comment-6 Multiviews is also an option here, although it takes a little bit more time preparing your code the finished url output is excellent. Multiviews is also an option here, although it takes a little bit more time preparing your code the finished url output is excellent.

]]>